Skip to main content
· 10/15/2012

Remmie v. Mabus

Citations

  • 898 F. Supp. 2d 108
  • 2012 WL 4856418
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating agency's purported rationale for a final decision explained in its briefing to the Court is no substitute for the agency's actual explanation
  • stating agency’s purported rationale for a final decision explained in its briefing to the Court is no substitute for the agency’s actual explanation
  • stating agency’s purported rationale of a final decision explained in its briefing to the Court is no substitute for the agency’s actual explanation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.