· 10/15/2012
Remmie v. Mabus
Citations
- 898 F. Supp. 2d 108
- 2012 WL 4856418
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147628
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating agency's purported rationale for a final decision explained in its briefing to the Court is no substitute for the agency's actual explanation
- stating agency’s purported rationale for a final decision explained in its briefing to the Court is no substitute for the agency’s actual explanation
- stating agency’s purported rationale of a final decision explained in its briefing to the Court is no substitute for the agency’s actual explanation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.