Sierra Club v. Mainella

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court’s role is to determine whether “the evidence in the administrative record permitted the agency to make the decision it did”
• holding agency failed to take a hard look at environmental impacts “as evidenced by the lack of explanations supporting its conclusions”
• summary judgment standard “does not apply because of the limited role of a court in reviewing the administrative record”
• \[T]he standard set forth in Rule 56(C) does not apply [in an APA case] because of the limited role of a court in reviewing the administrative record.\
• “[T]he standard set forth in Rule 56(c) does not apply [in an APA case] because of the limited role of a court in reviewing the administrative record.”
• “[T]he standard set forth in Rule 56(c) does not apply [in an APA case] because 22 of the limited role of a court in reviewing the administrative record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).