Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 8/10/1988

Wilder v. Thomas

Citations

  • 854 F.2d 605
  • 18 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21285
  • 28 ERC (BNA) 1241
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • new evidence did not disturb the application of issue preclusion (collateral estoppel) under New York law because, among other reasons, “[t]here is no new evidence germane to the issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.