Capital Telephone Co. v. Pattersonville Telephone Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where plaintiffs do not challenge reasonableness of tariff but rather seek to enforce federal antitrust laws, PSC does not have exclusive, original jurisdiction
• although proponent of preclusion must prove that the issue was identical and necessarily decided, the opponent must prove that it did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue
• although proponent of preclusion must prove that the issue was identical and necessarily decided, the opponent must prove that it did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue
• the doctrine is \intended to co-ordinate the relationship between courts and administrative agencies to the end that divergence of opinion between them not render ineffective the statutes with which both are concerned\
• the doctrine is \intended to co-ordinate the relationship between courts and administrative agencies to the end that divergence of opinion between them not render ineffective the statutes with which both are concerned\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).