Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Busey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, although complaints in the case “recited requests for permanent injunctions];,]” the parties never “moved to restrain or enjoin any aspect of the project.”
• finding that suit under APA was not implicitly precluded by the CAA in part because “the APA provides a right of review of agency decisions precisely where a plaintiffs claim is not covered by the citizen suit provision of the substantive act.”
• taking note of the lower courts' \broad discretion\ in this regard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).