Wiechman v. Huddleston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the jurisdictional exception in an action to set aside a final judgment because the exception conflicts with the statute that sets out appellate jurisdiction and holding that a desire to maintain consistency with federal courts should not trump state statutes
• \appellate court . . . has a duty to question jurisdiction on its own initiative.\
• \An appellate court has no authority to create an exception to statutory jurisdictional requirements to allow an appeal . . . .\
• Generally, Kansas appellate courts have 16 jurisdiction to entertain an appeal only if the appeal is taken by following the procedural statutes
• where record discloses lack of jurisdiction, appellate court must dismiss appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Wiechman v. Huddleston

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Wiechman v. Huddleston
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-10-07