Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/15/2016

Wiechman v. Huddleston

Citations

304 Kan. 80
370 P.3d 1194
2016 WL 1533606
2016 Kan. LEXIS 234

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting the jurisdictional exception in an action to set aside a final judgment because the exception conflicts with the statute that sets out appellate jurisdiction and holding that a desire to maintain consistency with federal courts should not trump state statutes
\appellate court . . . has a duty to question jurisdiction on its own initiative.\
\An appellate court has no authority to create an exception to statutory jurisdictional requirements to allow an appeal . . . .\
Generally, Kansas appellate courts have 16 jurisdiction to entertain an appeal only if the appeal is taken by following the procedural statutes
where record discloses lack of jurisdiction, appellate court must dismiss appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biles, Stegall, Harth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Wiechman v. Huddleston

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Wiechman v. Huddleston
Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-10-07

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.