Bruch v. Kansas Department of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that K.S.A. 77-614[b][5] and K.S.A. 77-614[b][6] are “related” requirements
• noting that driver technically “passed the field sobriety tests”
• noting that Bruch technically passed the field sobriety tests
• strict compliance with the pleading requirements of K.S.A. 77-614[b] is necessary before a court may exercise jurisdiction over a petition for judicial review
• “Parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction by consent, waiver, or estoppel, nor can parties convey jurisdiction on a court by fading to object to its lack of jurisdiction.”
• strict compliance with the pleading requirements of K.S.A. 77-614[b] is necessaiy before a court may exercise jurisdiction over a petition for judicial review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).