Asset Acceptance, LLC v. Moberly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court’s grant of CR 60.02(f) relief was immediately appealable if it appeared to be an untimely attempt to reopen under CR 60.02(a)-(c)
• holding that a trial court’s grant of CR 60.02(f) relief was immediately appealable if it appeared to be an untimely attempt to reopen under CR 60.02(a)-(c)
• allowing appeal of order setting aside judgment more than a year old pursuant to CR 60.02(f)
• adopting the jurisdictional exception because the federal practice “remains viable” after 120 years
• adopting “so-called jurisdictional” exception to general rule that orders setting aside judgments and reopening for trial are not final and appealable to permit immediate appeal of orders granting CR 60.02(f) relief to ensure that CR 60.02(f
• adopting what is referred to as the “jurisdictional exception” to allow a litigant to immediately appeal an order setting aside a final judgment on the ground that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the untimely motion to set aside

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).