Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/23/2015

Kaelter v. Sokol

Citations

301 Kan. 247
340 P.3d 1210
2015 Kan. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that appeals can be taken only from final decisions
holding no final judgment existed when the district court, which had issued an order stating it would determine the extent of certain expenses, had not yet resolved those expenses
defining \final order\ as \an order that definitely terminates a right or liability involved in an action or that grants or refuses a remedy as a terminal act in the case\
order was not a final decision when it \left unresolved [an] unreimbursed medical expenses issue\
\An appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals as a matter of right from any 'final decision.' K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 60-2102[a][4].\
“ ‘Kansas appellate courts may exercise jurisdiction only under circumstances allowed by statute.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biles, Malone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Kaelter v. Sokol

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.