Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/19/2002
Wholey v. Roebuck
Citations
- 803 A.2d 482
- 370 Md. 38
- 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1313
- 2002 Md. LEXIS 371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The tort of wrongful discharge is one exception to the well-established principle that an at-will employee may be discharged by his employer for any reason, or no reason at all.”
- “[T]o establish a wrongful discharge, the employee must be discharged, the basis for the employee’s discharge must violate some clear mandate of public policy, and there must be a nexus between the employee’s conduct and the employer’s decision to fire the employee.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Banks v. International Rental & Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2011-12-15· cited 162×
- Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-01-09· cited 143×
- Lloyd v. Drake UniversitySupreme Court of Iowa· 2004-09-01· cited 74×
- Liddy v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-29· cited 53×
- Woodbury v. Victory Van LinesD. Maryland· 2017-12-21· cited 53×
- French v. HinesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-03· cited 46×
- Porterfield v. Mascari II, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-05-08· cited 46×
- Karen Dorshkind v. Oak Park Place of Dubuque II, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2013-08-02· cited 44×
- Cain v. Midland Funding, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-24· cited 37×
- Parks v. Alpharma, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-19· cited 31×
- King v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-27· cited 27×
- Murphy-Taylor v. HofmannD. Maryland· 2013-09-12· cited 27×
- Forster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-22· cited 25×
- Vasquez v. Whole Foods Mkt., Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2018-02-09· cited 24×
- Yuan v. Johns Hopkins UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-29· cited 23×
- Taghivand v. Rite Aid Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-01-28· cited 21×
- Glynn v. Edo Corp.D. Maryland· 2008-02-27· cited 19×
- Khalifa v. ShannonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-04-09· cited 18×
- Lark v. Montgomery Hospice, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-13· cited 16×
- Symeonidis v. Paxton Capital Group, Inc.D. Maryland· 2002-07-15· cited 12×
Cites
74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 1,430×
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1983-03-29· cited 1,284×
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1930-04-14· cited 1,162×
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 695×
- Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-08· cited 657×
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 536×
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-01-22· cited 532×
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-25· cited 514×
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court· 1985-11-27· cited 506×
- Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1980-07-28· cited 501×
- Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court· 1973-05-01· cited 448×
- Harris v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-12-09· cited 400×
- Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1978-07-14· cited 392×
- Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1987-03-26· cited 365×
- Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1989-02-07· cited 352×
- Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal· 1959-09-30· cited 340×
- Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-07-16· cited 337×
- Bowman v. State Bank of KeysvilleSupreme Court of Virginia· 1985-06-14· cited 335×
- Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court· 1975-06-12· cited 305×
- Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-02-28· cited 299×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.