Glynn v. Edo Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]imply because Caprario and Puzzo worked for IST does not make them subject to jurisdiction wherever IST might be sued.”
• complementary remedies do not give rise to an inference of Congressional intent to preempt
• ‘complementary remedies do not give rise fo an inference of Congressional intent to preempt’
• describing section 1107 as serving to \deter[] retaliation against whistleblowers\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).