Ninth Circuit· 4/3/1969
Whitner v. Davis
Citations
- 410 F.2d 24
- 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12994
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the University and the Board of Regents are not “persons” within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 1983
- where complaint “plainly indicates” plaintiff intends to invoke certain statute, 6 failure to cite statute in complaint “is of no consequence”
- state college not a “person”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Morrison v. JonesNinth Circuit· 1979-10-19· cited 88×
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.E.D. California· 2004-01-09· cited 74×
- Golden Gate Acceptance Corp., and Fred Kohlenberg v. General Motors Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1979-05-23· cited 27×
- Johnson v. RockefellerS.D. New York· 1972-12-18· cited 23×
- Dougall v. SugarmanS.D. New York· 1971-05-24· cited 9×
- Ahmed v. WashingtonNinth Circuit· 2001-08-28· cited 8×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. CaliforniaE.D. California· 1981-04-03· cited 6×
- Schmidt v. FrankE.D. New York· 1974-04-23· cited 1×
- Maryland Public Interest Research Group v. ElkinsD. Maryland· 1976-12-30
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 6,021×
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 4,784×
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court· 1963-06-03· cited 954×
- Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks DepartmentSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 644×
- Damico v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 307×
- Clyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1905-03-13· cited 280×
- Michael Cohen v. Russell K. NorrisNinth Circuit· 1962-01-30· cited 258×
- Houghton v. ShaferSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 246×
- Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeNinth Circuit· 1966-10-31· cited 215×
- Angelynn York v. Ron Story and Louis MorenoNinth Circuit· 1963-10-28· cited 187×
- Whitner v. DavisNinth Circuit· 1969-04-03· cited 93×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1965-12-03· cited 73×
- Craycroft v. FerrallNinth Circuit· 1969-03-05· cited 64×
- Harold J. Frazier v. East Baton Rouge Parish School BoardFifth Circuit· 1966-07-11· cited 43×
- Sarah Louise McCoy on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Louisiana State Board of EducationFifth Circuit· 1965-05-24· cited 33×
- Sarah Louise McCoy on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Louisiana State Board of EducationFifth Circuit· 1964-06-05· cited 30×
- Wall v. Stanly County Board of EducationFourth Circuit· 1967-05-19· cited 30×
- Unnamed caseSixth Circuit· 1968-02-19· cited 29×
- Dorsey v. State Athletic CommissionE.D. Louisiana· 1958-11-28· cited 27×
- In Re JohnsonWashington Supreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.