Skip to main content
· 1/9/2004

United States v. Southern California Edison Co.

Citations

  • 300 F. Supp. 2d 964
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4545
  • 2004 WL 230740

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[D]ocuments are judicially noticeable only for the purpose of determining what statements are contained therein, not to prove the truth of the contents or any party’s assertion of what the contents mean.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wanger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.