Skip to main content
· 10/31/1966

Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus Curiae

Citations

  • 366 F.2d 678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Washington State Bar 20 Association is a state agency and immune from suit under Eleventh Amendment
  • holding that the Washington State Bar Association is an “agency of the state” and therefore not a “person” subject to liability under § 1983
  • concluding that the Washington State Bar Association is a state agency and immune from suit under Eleventh Amendment
  • holding the federal court lacked jurisdiction over disbarred attorney’s suit seeking to vacate judgment of disbarment in the state court
  • concluding the Washington State Bar Association is “an agency of the state” and not subject to liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
  • stating that bar association prosecuting attorneys are immune from damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Hamley, Jertberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.