· 10/31/1966
Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus Curiae
Citations
- 366 F.2d 678
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the Washington State Bar 20 Association is a state agency and immune from suit under Eleventh Amendment
- holding that the Washington State Bar Association is an “agency of the state” and therefore not a “person” subject to liability under § 1983
- concluding that the Washington State Bar Association is a state agency and immune from suit under Eleventh Amendment
- holding the federal court lacked jurisdiction over disbarred attorney’s suit seeking to vacate judgment of disbarment in the state court
- concluding the Washington State Bar Association is “an agency of the state” and not subject to liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
- stating that bar association prosecuting attorneys are immune from damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barnes, Hamley, Jertberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.