S.D. New York· 12/18/1972
Johnson v. Rockefeller
Citations
- 58 F.R.D. 42
- 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10665
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Since the amended complaint names [the intervenor] as a plaintiff, his motion is now moot...”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lasker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court· 1993-05-05· cited 165×
- Okpalobi v. FosterFifth Circuit· 1999-09-17· cited 70×
- Hendrix v. FaulknerN.D. Indiana· 1981-10-21· cited 46×
- Gras v. StevensS.D. New York· 1976-05-06· cited 42×
- Johnson v. RockefellerS.D. New York· 1973-10-09· cited 39×
- Brause v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-04-17· cited 39×
- Thompson v. BondW.D. Missouri· 1976-10-15· cited 29×
- Allied Artists Pictures Corp. v. RhodesS.D. Ohio· 1979-06-22· cited 23×
- NAACP v. State of Cal.E.D. California· 1981-04-03· cited 18×
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. LefkowitzS.D. New York· 1974-11-07· cited 16×
- Morial v. Judiciary Commission of State of La.E.D. Louisiana· 1977-03-02· cited 8×
- Salisbury v. ListD. Nevada· 1980-10-07· cited 8×
- Sugar v. CURTIS CIRCULATION COMPANYS.D. New York· 1974-06-17· cited 7×
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. CaliforniaE.D. California· 1981-04-03· cited 6×
- Vail v. QuinlanS.D. New York· 1975-01-13· cited 4×
- Stenson v. State of NYS.D. New York· 1976-11-01· cited 3×
- Ifeanyi Charles Anthony Okpalobi v. Mike FosterFifth Circuit· 1999-09-17
- Brause v. STATE, DEPT. OF H. & SSAlaska Supreme Court· 2001-04-17
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 4,784×
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 3,777×
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1961-05-29· cited 3,439×
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1923-06-04· cited 3,363×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court· 1937-03-01· cited 3,033×
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,147×
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court· 1942-06-01· cited 1,929×
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court· 1972-03-22· cited 1,851×
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court· 1973-01-10· cited 846×
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 515×
- Great Northern Life Insurance Co. v. ReadSupreme Court· 1944-04-24· cited 463×
- California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court· 1938-05-16· cited 280×
- Fitts v. McGheeSupreme Court· 1899-01-03· cited 275×
- Landon Zuckerman and Sam Haber v. Appellate Division, Second Department, Supreme Court of the State of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1970-01-29· cited 141×
- Duhne v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1920-01-12· cited 85×
- Socialist Workers Party v. RockefellerS.D. New York· 1970-10-12· cited 77×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1965-12-03· cited 73×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.