Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 246 S.E.2d 363
  • 146 Ga. App. 277
  • 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant may, by proper and timely objection, prevent the State from introducing evidence excluded by the Rape Shield Statute
  • holding that a defendant may, by proper and timely objection, prevent the State from introducing evidence excluded by the Rape Shield Statute
  • “[R]ape shield laws are intended generally to protect the complaining witness, thereby encouraging the reporting and prosecution of rapes____”
  • testimony that alleged victim was not a virgin inadmissible to prove defendant's reasonable belief in consent
  • “there is no method by which the [S]tate can properly introduce the proscribed evidence” under the Rape Shield Statute
  • an act may intend to exclude evidence for any purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shulman, Bell, Birdsong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.