Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 9/27/2000

White v. Lee

Citations

  • 227 F.3d 1214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that intrusive investigation that did not culminate in an arrest could chill the exercise of First Amendment rights
  • holding that the Noerr-Pennington doctrine is not limited 9 to the antitrust context but “applies equally in all contexts”
  • holding that mootness is properly raised in a motion to dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) because it pertains to a court’s subject matter jurisdiction (citations omitted)
  • holding that “[i]nformal measures,” including “invoking legal sanctions and other means of coercion, persuasion, and intimidation,” can violate the First Amendment even if not carried out
  • holding that standing is examined at the commencement of the litigation
  • holding that an investigation “exceeded the bounds of reasonable governmental action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

144 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.