Ninth Circuit· 4/8/2022
Brian Mecinas v. Katie Hobbs
Citations
- 30 F.4th 890
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that that a ballot-order statute created an illegally structured competitive environment that supported standing
- noting that, when a moving party 3 makes a factual challenge to subject matter jurisdiction by presenting evidence, “the court 4 may resolve any factual disputes concerning the existence of jurisdiction”
- requiring “the implicated state official [to] have a relevant role that goes beyond a generalized duty to enforce state law or general supervisory power over the persons responsible for enforcing the challenged provision” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “[T]he first step . . . is to consider the character and magnitude of the asserted 20 injury . . . .”
- “In a suit with multiple plaintiffs, generally only one plaintiff need have standing for the suit to proceed.”
- “And given that Arizona’s asserted interest in a manageable ballot 14 could seemingly be effectuated through a nondiscriminatory ordering system, judgment in the 15 Secretary’s favor is premature at this juncture.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Election Integrity Project California, Inc. v. Shirley WeberNinth Circuit· 2024-08-15· cited 19×
- Kristen Hall v. Smosh Dot Com, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2023-06-30· cited 12×
- Andy Kim v. Christine HanlonThird Circuit· 2024-04-17· cited 11×
- Fossella v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2024-02-21· cited 1×
- R. W. v. Columbia Basin CollegeNinth Circuit· 2023-08-14
- Vicente Borja v. Scott NagoNinth Circuit· 2024-08-30
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. Executive Office of the PresidentDistrict of Columbia· 2025-04-24
- Los Angeles Press Club v. NoemNinth Circuit· 2026-04-01
- Forward, Inc. v. MacOmberNinth Circuit· 2026-04-27
- Forward, Inc. v. MacOmberNinth Circuit· 2026-06-09
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 3,789×
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 1,828×
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court· 1992-06-08· cited 1,446×
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 1,395×
- Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa CountyNinth Circuit· 2003-09-10· cited 733×
- Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New PartySupreme Court· 1997-04-28· cited 645×
- White v. LeeNinth Circuit· 2000-09-27· cited 502×
- Richard Augustine v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1983-04-26· cited 471×
- Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationNinth Circuit· 2001-09-24· cited 409×
- Gill v. WhitfordSupreme Court· 2018-06-18· cited 372×
- Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-01-13· cited 369×
- Zivotofsky Ex Rel. Zivotofsky v. ClintonSupreme Court· 2012-03-26· cited 264×
- Rucho v. Common CauseSupreme Court· 2019-06-27· cited 237×
- Washington Environmental Counc v. Theodore SturdevantNinth Circuit· 2013-10-17· cited 178×
- Planned Parenthood of Idaho, Inc. v. WasdenNinth Circuit· 2004-07-16· cited 145×
- Shays v. Federal Election CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2005-07-15· cited 136×
- Texas Democratic Party v. BenkiserFifth Circuit· 2006-08-03· cited 129×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.