Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 4/5/2002

White v. Barnhart

Citations

  • 287 F.3d 903

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that much of the medical evidence was in conflict, but the ALJ weighed all the evidence in reaching his decision and the court could not “now reweigh that evidence and substitute [its] judgment for his”
  • recognizing that much of the medical evidence was in conflict but the ALJ weighed all the evidence in reaching his decision and the court could not “now reweigh that evidence and substitute [its] judgment for his”
  • recognizing that much of the medical evidence was in conflict but the ALJ weighed all the evidence in reaching his decision and the court could not “now reweigh that evidence and substitute [its] judgment for his”
  • stating that courts should defer to the credibility determinations of the ALJ in resolving issues of subjective allegations
  • holding that ALJ subjective symptom evaluations “warrant particular deference”
  • recognizing ALJ’s obligation to contact treating physician whenever information received from physician is inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.