Oldham v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ALJ’s discussion of contrary, well-supported medical evidence provided a sufficient basis for giving a treating source opinion very little weight
• holding that the ALJ’s discussion of contrary, well- supported medical evidence provided a sufficient basis for giving a treating source opinion very little weight
• recognizing that an ALJ is not required to “apply expressly” every relevant factor for weighing opinion evidence
• holding that, because the ALJ provided “good reasons” in weighing the medical opinions, “[n]othing more was required”
• holding that the ALJ’s discussion of contrary, well-supported medical evidence provided a sufficient basis for giving a treating source opinion very little weight
• holding that the ALJ’s finding that the applicant “suffered from severe impairments[,]” without more, “was all the ALJ was required to do” at Step Two

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).