Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/30/2021

Wheeling v. Selene Finance

Citations

250 A.3d 197
473 Md. 356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that testimony that an individual felt “bad” or “upset,” absent other physical injuries, would not suffice to prove emotional damages
“Where questions of law and statutory interpretation are presented, this Court reviews them de novo[.]”
ultimate goal of statutory interpretation is to “ascertain and effectuate the General Assembly’s purpose and intent when it enacted the statute” (emphasis added)
“Where questions of law and statutory interpretation are presented, this Court reviews them de novo[.]”
ultimate goal of statutory interpretation is to “ascertain and effectuate the General Assembly’s purpose and intent when it enacted the statute” (emphasis added)
plaintiffs claiming in their Amended Complaint that they suffer ‘“emotional damages and losses with physical manifestations’” because of defendants’ actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Booth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.