Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/9/1993
Faya v. Almaraz
Citations
- 620 A.2d 327
- 329 Md. 435
- 61 U.S.L.W. 2554
- 1993 Md. LEXIS 28
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- implying that only reasonable fear is proximately caused by a defendant’s negligence
- reversing dismissal when HIV-positive surgeon operated on the appellants without their knowledge of his disease
- permitting plaintiffs to recover for reasonable fear of contracting AIDS after having been operated on by a surgeon who had AIDS
- relying on medical journals and reports to give context to what was known at the time about AIDS and HIV
- determining that fear of contracting HIV was objectively reasonable only within a certain window of time based on “current credible evidence of a 95% certainty that one will test positive for the AIDS virus, if at all, within six months after exposure to it”
- relying on presence of physical manifestations such as headaches and sleeplessness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
134 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brzoska v. OlsonSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-09-08· cited 367×
- Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-02-08· cited 313×
- Barrett v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-02-21· cited 288×
- Green v. H & R BLOCK, INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-25· cited 181×
- Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-06· cited 166×
- Valentine v. on Target, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-19· cited 142×
- Morris v. Osmose Wood PreservingCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-11-14· cited 126×
- Caldor, Inc. v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-06-09· cited 117×
- Allied Investment Corp. v. JasenCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-06-25· cited 117×
- Muthukumarana v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-08-26· cited 103×
- Southland Corp. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-09· cited 99×
- Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court· 1995-05-19· cited 96×
- Dashiell v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-12-14· cited 92×
- Wheeling v. Selene FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-04-30· cited 92×
- A.J. Decoster Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-01-07· cited 88×
- Doe v. Archdiocese of WashingtonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-02-26· cited 88×
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. FlippoCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-02-18· cited 85×
- Fioretti v. Maryland State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-08-31· cited 81×
- K.A.C. v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-02-10· cited 78×
- Ditto v. McCurdyNinth Circuit· 2007-12-14· cited 78×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.