Bennett v. Harford County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a \proposed avenue of review [ ] beset with penalties and other impediments [is] inadequate as a satisfactory alternative to [pre-enforcement review]\
• concluding that a “proposed avenue of review [] beset with penalties and other impediments [is] inadequate as a satisfactory alternative to [pre-enforcement review]”
• Finding that the regulations are “self-executing and have an immediate and substantial impact”
• “Withholding court consideration of an action causes hardship to the plaintiff where the complained-of conduct has an ‘immediate and substantial impact’ on the plaintiff.”
• entering declaratory judgment that § 206.27(c)(1) was invalid as applied to the reverse mortgage at issue, and that the borrower's death was not a triggering event for purposes of HUD's regulations
• requiring litigants to “refuse to comply ... and test the regulations by defending against government criminal, seizure, or injunctive suits against them” is not “a satisfactory alternative to [pre-enforcement review]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).