District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/18/1996
Henderson v. State
Citations
- 679 So. 2d 805
- 1996 WL 425655
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing “that the State was not required to exclude any unreasonable hypothesis” and concluding that the argued hypothesis “in light of the evidence, created a legitimate question for the jury to determine”
- Although State is required to provide evidence inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence in order to submit case to jury, State is not required to exclude any unreasonable hypothesis.
- “While we must agree with [appellant] that the State was required to provide evidence inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence, we emphasize that the State was not required to exclude any unreasonable hypothesis.”
- “While we must agree with [appellant] that the State was required to provide evidence inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence, we emphasize that the State was not required to exclude any unreasonable hypothesis.”
- “While we must agree with [Appellant] that the State was required to provide evidence inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence, we emphasize that the State was not required to exclude any unreasonable hypothesis.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cope, Levy and Fletcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Knight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-18· cited 25×
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-21· cited 12×
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-06-26· cited 11×
- Westbrooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-13· cited 11×
- Kemp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-15· cited 8×
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-05· cited 5×
- State v. CampbellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-21· cited 1×
- Richard Kevin Kline v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-10· cited 1×
- Cardali v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-03· cited 1×
- Capote v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-17
- Sanchez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-18
- J. N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-25
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LawSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 545×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-07-21· cited 155×
- Coney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 135×
- Toole v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-07-11· cited 73×
- Douglas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-10-15· cited 51×
- J. H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-05-15· cited 47×
- A. Y. G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-08· cited 24×
- Lincoln v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-11-21· cited 18×
- Stuckey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-08· cited 7×
- Ogden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-19· cited 4×
- Caldwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-03-10· cited 2×
- E.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.