Singleton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that direct evidence of defendant’s DNA found at the scene was “direct evidence merely of a circumstance that suggested his participation” in the burglary and theft but was “not direct evidence of [his] participation in the burglary’
• applying circumstantial evidence standard where there was no direct evidence of defendant’s participation in the offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Westbrooks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-13· cited 11×
• Tucker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-12· cited 5×
• Rivers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-23· cited 3×
• Miranda v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-27· cited 2×
• State v. Campbell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-21· cited 1×
• TIMOTHY LEE DOBBINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-07-24

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pagan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
• State v. Law
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 545×
• Hertz v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-11-01· cited 63×
• Baugh v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-04-26· cited 42×
• Owen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-29· cited 25×
• Valdez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-30· cited 21×
• Sundin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-15· cited 18×
• Solomon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-10-10· cited 12×
• Horne v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-05· cited 7×
• Atkinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-24· cited 3×