Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/30/2022

West Virginia v. EPA

Citations

  • 597 U.S. 697

About this case

West Virginia v. Epa

Look for West Virginia v. Epa on one of Wikipedia's sister projects :

[Wiktionary](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:Search/West_Virginia_v._Epa "wiktionary:Special:Search/West Virginia v. Epa")
 (dictionary)
[Wikibooks](https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special:Search/West_Virginia_v._Epa "wikibooks:Special:Search/West Virginia v. Epa")
 (textbooks)
[Wikiquote](https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Special:Search/West_Virginia_v._Epa "wikiquote:Special:Search/West Virginia v. Epa")
 (quotations)
[Wikisource](https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Special:Search/West_Virginia_v._Epa "wikisource:Special:Search/West Virginia v. Epa")
 (library)
[Wikiversity](https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special:Search/West_Virginia_v._Epa "wikiversity:Special:Search/West Virginia v. Epa")
 (learning resources)
[Commons](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/West_Virginia_v._Epa "commons:Special:Search/West Virginia v. Epa")
 (media)
[Wikivoyage](https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Special:Search/West_Virginia_v._Epa "wikivoyage:Special:Search/West Virginia v. Epa")
 (travel guide)
[Wikidata](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Search/West_Virginia_v._Epa "wikidata:Special:Search/West Virginia v. Epa")
 (linked database)
[Wikispecies](https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/West_Virginia_v._Epa "wikispecies:Special:Search/West Virginia v. Epa")
 (species directory)

Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for West Virginia v. Epa in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.


Other reasons this message may be displayed:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Virginia_v._Epa "

Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]n certain extraordinary cases, both separation of powers principles and a practical understanding of legislative intent make us ‘reluctant to read into ambiguous statutory text’ the delegation claimed to be lurking there.”
  • “It is a fundamental canon of statutory construction that the words of a statute must be read in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • requiring “clear congressional authorization” for “extraordinary” assertions of regulatory authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John G. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named West Virginia v. EPA

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.