Veterans Claims· 2/22/2001

Holliday v. Principi

Citations

14 Vet. App. 280
2001 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 125
2001 WL 179824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that all provisions of the VCAA are potentially applicable to claims pending on the date of enactment
holding that the VCAA may be \potentially applicable to claims pending on the date of the VCAA's enactment.\
holding that all provisions of the VCAA are potentially applicable to claims pending on the date of enactment
holding that VCAA provisions are potentially applicable to claims pending on date of VCAA enactment
holding that all provisions of the VCAA are potentially applicable to claims pending on the date of enactment
stating that “the Court must avoid cutting off an appellant’s rights under the VCAA by prematurely injecting itself into the VA adjudication process” because to do so “where no section 5103(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kramer, Steinberg, Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Holliday v. Principi

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.