Arthur Hickson v. Eric K. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Secretary’s interpretation of the regulation at issue was in conflict with the plain language used
• concluding that Secretary's interpretation of the regulation at issue was in conflict with the plain language used
• holding that section 7104(2) applies to claims to reopen
• noting that where the Board reopens a claim, but the AOJ did not, the claim must be remanded for AOJ consideration unless there is a waiver from the appellant or no prejudice would result from the readjudication of the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).