Skip to main content
· 3/22/2010

Wells v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

Citations

  • 601 F.3d 375
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5894
  • 2010 WL 1010591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although there are ‘no certainties in science,’ the expert must present 6 Case: 11-50193 Document: 00511893048 Page: 7 Date Filed: 06/20/2012 No. 11-50193 conclusions ‘ground[ed] in the methods and procedures of science.’” (alteration in original
  • “Without the predicate proof of general causation, the [failure to warn] tort claim fails.”
  • “Although there are ‘no certainties in science,’ the expert must present conclusions ‘ground[ed] in the methods and procedures of science.’” (alteration in original) (quoting Daubert v. Merrell Dow pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 590, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Garza, Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.