Riverwood Intern. Corp. v. Employers Ins. of Wausau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “[t]he fact that a term is not defined in a policy . . . does not alone make it ambiguous” and noting that “[i]nstead, the term . . . must be given its plain meaning.”
• asbestos-related illness constituted “bodily injury by disease” under the policy, and thus was subject to the 36-month exclusion provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).