Weiss v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• attributing transfer- or-eompany with intent harbored by controlling shareholder-principal in connection with transfer subject to avoidance
• “[A] manifest wish by the controlling person [of the Ponzi scheme] to prolong the imposture of the Ponzi scheme” furthers it.
• intent inferred via presumption “can always be rebutted by hard proof of contrary intent, i.e. a credible motivation to make the transfer that is grounded in good economic reason, as to the transferor-entity ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).