Court of Appeals of Arizona· 5/16/2014
Weinstein v. Weinstein
Citations
- 235 Ariz. 40
- 326 P.3d 307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A party challenging the amount of fees requested must . . . specify which amount or items are excessive.”
- “A valid spendthrift provision makes it impossible for a beneficiary to make a legally binding transfer.” (emphasis added) (cleaned up)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Manicom v. Citimortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-10-28· cited 19×
- City of Tempe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-06-04· cited 13×
- Cook v. GrebeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-09-11· cited 3×
- Ortiz v. Trinity Financial Services LLCD. Arizona· 2015-03-26· cited 1×
- ML Manager, LLC v. Hawkins (In re Mortages Ltd.)D. Arizona· 2016-09-19· cited 1×
- Knight v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2023-08-10· cited 1×
- tempe/chavez v. state/brnovichCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-06-04
- Talking Rock v. Inscription CanyonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-04-09
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-29· cited 325×
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-07-28· cited 247×
- Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony SocietyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-10-29· cited 118×
- Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass'n v. KitchukovCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-08-09· cited 68×
- Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-10-09· cited 60×
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-12-04· cited 59×
- Haroutunian v. Valueoptions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-07-10· cited 54×
- SOLIMENO v. YonanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-03-18· cited 48×
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-02-09· cited 47×
- Pinal Vista Properties, L.L.C. v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-06-17· cited 44×
- Estate of Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 2007-01-23· cited 41×
- League of Ariz. Cities and Towns v. MartinArizona Supreme Court· 2009-02-03· cited 38×
- Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-07-13· cited 37×
- Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-01-22· cited 36×
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. ToccoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-10-08· cited 36×
- Sotomayor v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-08· cited 35×
- Harris v. PurcellArizona Supreme Court· 1998-12-17· cited 27×
- Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-09-19· cited 26×
- Garrett v. Reid-Cashion Land & Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1928-10-15· cited 26×
- Squaw Peak Community Covenant Church v. Anozira Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-04-08· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.