Skip to main content

Weinstein v. Weinstein

Citations

  • 235 Ariz. 40
  • 326 P.3d 307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A party challenging the amount of fees requested must . . . specify which amount or items are excessive.”
  • “A valid spendthrift provision makes it impossible for a beneficiary to make a legally binding transfer.” (emphasis added) (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.