Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that plaintiff must prove defendant “unreasonably interfered” with plaintiff’s “use and enjoyment” of property, “causing significant harm,” to prevail on nuisance-tort claim
• explaining that we review a trial court's application of § 12-341.01 de novo, but we review the amount awarded for an abuse of discretion
• noting that liability attaches when a party “den[ies] the other party the reasonably expected benefits of the agreement”
• finding no abuse of discretion where the objecting party “argued generally that . . . counsel spent excessive time defending the case and questioned the necessity of various aspects of counsel’s work”
• \[W]e review the trial court's decision regarding the amount of fees awarded for an abuse of discretion.\
• “It is not enough simply to state, 22 for example, that the hours claimed are excessive . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).