Skip to main content
· 7/28/1983

Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.

Citations

  • 673 P.2d 927
  • 138 Ariz. 183
  • 1983 Ariz. App. LEXIS 574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that in certain circumstances “[w]here a party has achieved only partial or limited success . . . it would be unreasonable to award compensation for all hours expended, including time spent on the unsuccessful issues or claims.”
  • stating that 26 attorneys generally may recover for time spent “[p]reparing post-decision motions”
  • explaining that appellate courts are unsuited to conduct fact-finding on attorneys’ fees calculations
  • holding the preparation 25 of post-decision motions are includable in a fee application
  • stating in dicta that fees awarded to public sector attorneys should be measured by reasonable hourly rate prevailing in community for similar work
  • finding that there is sufficient detail in a billing report if counsel indicates “the type of legal services provided, the date the service was provided, the attorney providing the service . . . and the time spent in providing the service”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eubank, Haire, Meyerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.