Skip to main content
· 10/29/2004

Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony Society

Citations

  • 99 P.3d 1030
  • 209 Ariz. 260
  • 437 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 20
  • 2004 Ariz. App. LEXIS 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that arguments raised for the first time on appeal are untimely and therefore deemed waived
  • explaining that arguments not raised in the trial court are waived on appeal
  • noting “that some portions of appellees’ attorney fee expense was covered by insurance does not preclude the fees awards to appellees”
  • finding no payment 25 required under the Arizona wage statute when “neither the record nor the law supports any 26 contention that [the party] reasonably expected to be paid.”
  • court has discretion to award attorney fees and we will not disturb award absent abuse of discretion
  • “An award of attorney fees is left to the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Flórez, Espinosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.