Weinstein Enterprises, Inc. v. Orloff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a parent 22 corporation can exercise control over a wholly-owned subsidiary
• finding defacto control of J.W. Mays, Inc., by Weinstein, where Weinstein owned a 45% stake in Mays, and also controlled a Weinstein subsidiary that held an additional 6-7% stake in Mays
• \[T]he plaintiff must establish the actual exercise of control over the corporation's conduct by that otherwise minority stockholder.\
• “[T]he plaintiff must establish the actual exercise of control over the corporation’s conduct by that otherwise minority stockholder.”
• first citing Paramount Commc’ns, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc., 637 A.2d 34 (Del. 1994); then citing Citron v. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp., 569 A.2d 53, 70 (Del. 1989); and then citing Gilbert v. El Paso Co., 490 A.2d 1050, 1055 (Del. Ch. 1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).