Skip to main content
· 12/22/1989

Citron v. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp.

Citations

  • 569 A.2d 53
  • 1989 Del. LEXIS 469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a stockholder who dominates and has actual control of the corporation’s activities has fiduciary status
  • holding that enhanced scrutiny was the proper standard of review in a post-closing damages action but affirming the trial court’s finding that the directors had carried their burden of proof
  • stating that in determining whether the duty of due care was fulfilled, a court should look for evidence of whether the fiduciary has acted in a deliberate and knowledgeable way
  • noting that “directors cannot be passive instrumentalities during merger proceedings”
  • applying the rule to a third-party sale of a company free of self-dealing
  • affirming trial court’s finding after ten-day trial that board’s actions complied with enhanced scrutiny under Revlon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horsey, Moore, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.