Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 3/25/2010
WahlcoMetroflex, Inc. v. Baldwin
Citations
- 2010 ME 26
- 991 A.2d 44
- 2010 Me. LEXIS 26
- 2010 WL 1076326
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “To pursue unjust enrichment in equity, the plaintiff must lack an adequate remedy at law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saufley, Alexander, Levy, Silver, Mead, Jabar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kezer v. Central Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2012-04-05· cited 25×
- Santina Caruso v. The Jackson LaboratorySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2014-08-07· cited 21×
- Tibbetts v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-07-15· cited 19×
- In re Aqua Dots Products Liability LitigationN.D. Illinois· 2010-10-04· cited 17×
- In Re: Light Cigarettes Marketing Sales Practices LitigationD. Maine· 2010-07-26· cited 12×
- Brett Deane v. Central Maine Power CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2024-09-17· cited 3×
- Estate of Vera Boulier v. Presque Isle Nursing HomeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2014-02-13· cited 2×
- Core Finance Team Affiliates, LLC v. Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2024-11-26· cited 1×
- Towd Point Mortgage Trust 2019-4 v. Leslie BodwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2026-05-28
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-01· cited 1,206×
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-02-09· cited 877×
- In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1996-09-25· cited 387×
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware· 2006-06-08· cited 339×
- Grynberg v. Total S.A.Tenth Circuit· 2008-08-26· cited 209×
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2005-08-09· cited 206×
- Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-11-28· cited 149×
- Schock v. NashSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-06-16· cited 127×
- McPadden v. SidhuCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2008-08-29· cited 117×
- McMahon v. New Castle AssociatesCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1987-08-21· cited 107×
- In Re Baxter International, Inc. Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1995-03-07· cited 69×
- Seminaris v. LandaCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1995-05-02· cited 62×
- Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. v. Benihana, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2005-12-08· cited 60×
- Weinstein Enterprises, Inc. v. OrloffSupreme Court of Delaware· 2005-03-21· cited 40×
- In Re Wife, K.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1972-10-26· cited 23×
- Wood v. BellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2006-08-07· cited 19×
- Niedojadlo v. Central Maine Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1998-08-03· cited 18×
- State of São Paulo of Federative Republic of Brazil v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2007-02-23· cited 14×
- Keniston v. JPMorgan Chase BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2007-02-13· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.