Weddell v. H2O, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that this court will uphold a district court's factual findings so long as they are not clearly erroneous
• stating that this court will not overturn factual findings that are supported by substantial evidence
• stating that a district court's factual findings will be upheld unless they are clearly erroneous or unsupported by substantial evidence
• explaining that this court will uphold the district court's factual findings unless clearly erroneous or not supported by substantial evidence
• stating that questions of law are reviewed de novo, while factual findings are reviewed for substantial evidence
• noting that factual determinations will be upheld when they are not clearly erroneous and are support by substantial evidence, which has been defined as that which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).