Skip to main content
· 5/15/2008

Whitemaine v. Aniskovich

Citations

  • 183 P.3d 137
  • 124 Nev. 302
  • 2008 Nev. LEXIS 32
  • 27 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1183
  • 124 Nev. Adv. Rep. 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that this court reviews contract interpretation de novo and the district court's findings of facts for• substantial evidence
  • providing that this court reviews contract interpretation de novo and the district court's findings of facts for• substantial evidence
  • providing that this court reviews contract interpretation de novo and the district court's findings of facts for• substantial evidence
  • indicating that \whether a contract exists and the parties' intentions regarding a contractual provision are questions of fact\
  • indicating that \whether a contract exists and the parties' intentions regarding a contractual provision are questions of fact\
  • providing that this court reviews for substantial evidence the district court's factual findings as to whether a contract exists and the parties' intentions regarding a contractual provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maupin, Cherry, Saitta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.