· 5/15/2008
Whitemaine v. Aniskovich
Citations
- 183 P.3d 137
- 124 Nev. 302
- 2008 Nev. LEXIS 32
- 27 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1183
- 124 Nev. Adv. Rep. 29
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that this court reviews contract interpretation de novo and the district court's findings of facts for• substantial evidence
- providing that this court reviews contract interpretation de novo and the district court's findings of facts for• substantial evidence
- providing that this court reviews contract interpretation de novo and the district court's findings of facts for• substantial evidence
- indicating that \whether a contract exists and the parties' intentions regarding a contractual provision are questions of fact\
- indicating that \whether a contract exists and the parties' intentions regarding a contractual provision are questions of fact\
- providing that this court reviews for substantial evidence the district court's factual findings as to whether a contract exists and the parties' intentions regarding a contractual provision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maupin, Cherry, Saitta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.