Borger v. Dist. Ct.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that admissibility of expert witness testimony \`is governed by the scope of the witness'[s] knowledge and not the artificial classification of the witness by title'\ (quoting Marshall v. Yale Podiatry Group, 5 Conn.App. 5, 496 A.2d 529, 531 (1985))
• applying a de novo standard to review a district court’s interpretation of NRS 41A.071 in the course of resolving an original petition for a writ of mandamus
• applying a de novo standard to review a district court's interpretation of NRS 41A.071 in the course of resolving an original petition for a writ of mandamus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).