Skip to main content
· 4/17/2008

Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of North Las Vegas

Citations

  • 181 P.3d 670
  • 124 Nev. 224
  • 124 Nev. Adv. Rep. 21
  • 2008 Nev. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a “complaint should be dismissed only if it appears beyond a doubt that [the plaintiff] could prove no set of facts, which, if true, would entitle [the plaintiff] to relief”
  • recognizing that this court reviews de novo the district court's dismissal of a complaint
  • holding that this court reviews de novo an order granting an NRCP 12(b)(5) motion to dismiss, accepting all factual allegations in the complaint as true, and 'Although the district court's order also refers to NRS 41.036(2
  • recognizing that a complaint's factual allegations must be accepted as true
  • providing that, in reviewing an order that pertains to a motion to dismiss, we accept the nonmov-ing party’s factual allegations in the complaint as true
  • providing that, in reviewing an order that pertains to a motion to dismiss, we accept the nonmoving party's factual allegations in the complaint as true

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Gibbons, Maupin, Hardesty, Parraguirre, Cherry, Saitta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.