Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 6/27/2003
Webster v. State
Citations
- 827 A.2d 910
- 151 Md. App. 527
- 2003 Md. App. LEXIS 79
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the patient’s statements are apt to be sincere and reliable because the patient knows that the quality and success of the treatment depends upon the accuracy of the information presented to the physician”
- explaining that a “victim’s statement describing the assault may be admissible . . . even though it was taken and given for dual medical and forensic purposes” so long as “the challenged statement has some value in diagnosis or treatment[.]”
- upholding denial of a motion for mistrial where nearly identical evidence was admitted through a videotaped interview any other testimony
- collecting several cases that approve the admission of hearsay statements by a sexual assault victim given during a forensic interview due to the dual medical and forensic purposes for the examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollander, Kenney, Adkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PayneWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2010-05-06· cited 35×
- State v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court· 2020-02-24· cited 13×
- Coates v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-08-30· cited 12×
- State v. CoatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-13· cited 11×
- Fields v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-02-02· cited 11×
- Winston, Mayhew & Cannon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-02-02· cited 10×
- Griner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-25· cited 9×
- People v. TymeColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-04-25· cited 8×
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-10· cited 7×
- Rutherford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-23· cited 6×
- Imes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-16· cited 4×
- Davis v. PetitoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-02-28· cited 3×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-26· cited 3×
- Frobouck v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-06-06· cited 3×
- State v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court· 2023-04-20· cited 1×
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-10-24
- State v. Giovanni D.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-12-09
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Danial Siebert v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 310×
- Morgan v. ForetichFourth Circuit· 1988-05-17· cited 247×
- Thomas v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1985-03-25· cited 119×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-31· cited 113×
- Beahm v. ShortallCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-02-07· cited 103×
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-01-10· cited 87×
- Cassidy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-02-03· cited 69×
- Torres v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1991-04-18· cited 61×
- Rainville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-11-06· cited 55×
- State v. BrobergCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-06-11· cited 52×
- State v. JandaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-12-02· cited 44×
- State v. BellottiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-03-04· cited 43×
- Maryland Department of Human Resources v. Bo Peep Day NurseryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-11-13· cited 41×
- Sharp v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 41×
- Burks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-05-26· cited 41×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-21· cited 41×
- Gregory v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-09-06· cited 38×
- State v. HebertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-07-02· cited 33×
- State v. DanaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-04-15· cited 33×
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-12· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.