Skip to main content

Webster v. State

Citations

  • 827 A.2d 910
  • 151 Md. App. 527
  • 2003 Md. App. LEXIS 79

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the patient’s statements are apt to be sincere and reliable because the patient knows that the quality and success of the treatment depends upon the accuracy of the information presented to the physician”
  • explaining that a “victim’s statement describing the assault may be admissible . . . even though it was taken and given for dual medical and forensic purposes” so long as “the challenged statement has some value in diagnosis or treatment[.]”
  • upholding denial of a motion for mistrial where nearly identical evidence was admitted through a videotaped interview any other testimony
  • collecting several cases that approve the admission of hearsay statements by a sexual assault victim given during a forensic interview due to the dual medical and forensic purposes for the examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hollander, Kenney, Adkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.