Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 216 Md. App. 235
  • 85 A.3d 367
  • 2014 WL 766320
  • 2014 Md. App. LEXIS 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police had no justification to retain and further examine cell phone that was not an instrumentality of crime, fruit of crime, contraband, or evidence
  • “The appellant’s eleventh-hour piggybacking on [the co-defendant’s] renewal of his earlier objection does not, for the appellant, relate back to that earlier objection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zarnoch, Graeff, Moylan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.