Skip to main content

State v. Dana

Citations

  • 422 N.W.2d 246
  • 1988 Minn. LEXIS 88
  • 1988 WL 32681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, while expert testimony as to who had abused two brothers aged four and five was objectionable, “[e]xpert testimony relating to whether the children had been sexually abused was properly admitted”
  • expert testimony on whether it was the defendant who abused the child was objectionable, but defense counsel did not object
  • warranted search of premises where alleged abuse took place revealed physical evidence and photographs corroborating victims’ stories
  • warranted search of premises where alleged abuse took place revealed physical evidence and photographs corroborating victims' stories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amdahl, Kelley, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.