L.R. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that positive field test and officer's testimony based on his experience that the substance was cocaine was insufficient to support adjudication of delinquency where the state presented no laboratory report or chemist's testimony
• finding that a positive presumptive test for cocaine was insufficient to establish a prima facie case of possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-30· cited 34×
• Bell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-09· cited 11×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-13· cited 7×
• Bray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-13· cited 7×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-29· cited 5×
• Futch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-20· cited 2×
• State v. Hampton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-01· cited 1×
• Sharpe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-05· cited 1×
• C.E.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-21· cited 1×
• Higgins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-20· cited 1×
• KEVIN BLANCHARD VS. NEW JERSEY DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS (NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS)
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2019-10-29

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weaver v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-23· cited 19×
• Cabral v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-22· cited 10×