Watson v. Watson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that subject matter jurisdiction refers to the court’s power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong
• \Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the court's 'power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.'\ (quoting Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc., 314 S.C. 235, 237-38, 442 S.E.2d 598, 600 (1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bardoon Properties, NV v. Eidolon Corp.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-05-12· cited 31×
• Bunkum v. Manor Properties
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-01-22· cited 20×
• Simmons v. Simmons
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-04-10· cited 12×
• Coon v. Coon
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-09-22· cited 9×
• Theisen v. Theisen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-19· cited 6×
• Katzburg v. Katzburg
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-07-30· cited 2×
• Williams v. Jeffcoat
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-07-07
• Annie L. Myers v. Town of Calhoun Falls
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-07-05

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-03-21· cited 111×
• Mincey v. Mincey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1954-02-01· cited 26×
• Murray v. Murray
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-05-24· cited 12×
• Shaw v. Shaw
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-08-02· cited 8×
• Singley v. Singley
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-05-05· cited 3×