Murray v. Murray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that even if the husband’s initial decision to stay in the home constituted condonation, the condonation was nullified by the wife’s subsequent acts of misconduct
• holding it was not condonation for the husband to remain in the marital home on advice of counsel and for the sake of the parties’ young son after the wife committed marital misconduct
• affirming the family court’s award of alimony of $400 per month for six months when wife’s conduct caused the disintegration of the marriage and she was able to work
• husband did not condone wife’s misconduct where he remained in marital home on advice of counsel and for the sake of the parties’ young child
• no condonation in separate maintenance and support suit where husband stayed in home with wife
• no condonation in separate maintenance and support suit where husband stayed in home with wife

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bodkin v. Bodkin
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-05-27· cited 43×
• Watson v. Watson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-07-24· cited 17×
• Srivastava v. Srivastava
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-12-23· cited 17×
• Ariail v. Ariail
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-05-09· cited 11×
• Theisen v. Theisen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-19· cited 6×
• Lee v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-05-29· cited 5×
• Mason v. Mason
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-01-11· cited 3×
• Ariail v. Ariail
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1988-06-06
• Horton v. Horton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-06-25

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• McLaughlin v. McLaughlin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1964-05-13· cited 33×