Skip to main content
· 5/12/1997

Bardoon Properties, NV v. Eidolon Corp.

Citations

  • 485 S.E.2d 371
  • 326 S.C. 166
  • 1997 S.C. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “a party's lack of standing as a real party in interest” does not deprive the court of subject matter jurisdiction
  • stating that the question of real party in interest does not involve subject matter jurisdiction
  • holding because a defendant had not raised the issue of whether he was a real party in interest prior to the entry of default, the argument was waived
  • “A challenge to a party’s status as real party in interest must be made promptly or the court may conclude the point has been waived.”
  • \Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the court's power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.\
  • \Subject matter jurisdiction refers to the court's power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.