Skip to main content

Watson v. State

Citations

  • 900 S.W.2d 60
  • 1995 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 66
  • 1995 WL 335760

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that possession of two different Penalty 1 substances, i.e., heroin and cocaine, with intent to deliver constituted two separate offenses
  • holding that possession of heroin and possession of cocaine were separate offenses even though they arose out of a single transaction
  • holding that possession of two different Penalty 1 substances, i.e., heroin and cocaine, with intent to deliver constituted two separate offenses
  • holding that possession of cocaine is a different crime than possession of heroin
  • holding that the appellant waived the argument on the joinder of offenses on appeal because he failed to file a motion to sever with the trial court pursuant to Section 481.132 of the Texas Health and Safety Code
  • “We hold that the Legislature intended to make possession of each individual substance within the same penalty group a separate and distinct offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansfield, Clinton, Overstreet, Maloney, Baird, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.